Understanding the Court Ruling and Its Implications for the Gaming Industry
The gaming world has been abuzz with the recent court ruling involving Dark and Darker, a PC game developed by Ironmace, and Nexon a veteran game development studio.
The case revolves around allegations of copyright infringement and trade secret violations, highlighting the complex and often murky waters of intellectual property in the gaming industry.
Here’s a dive into the details of the case and what it means for both companies and the broader gaming community.
Here is what is in the article!
- ‘Dark and Darker‘ is at the center of a legal battle between Nexon and Ironmace over trade secrets and copyright.
- Nexon alleges a former employee stole P3 project files to develop the game, leading to legal action and a major fine.
- The court ruled no copyright infringement but found trade secret violations, ordering Ironmace to pay Nexon $5.87 million won (~$5.5 Million USD) in damages.
- The case highlights the importance of protecting trade secrets and sets a precedent for intellectual property disputes in the gaming industry.
The Background of the Case
The conflict between Nexon and Ironmace originated with a former Nexon employee, Ju-Hyun Choi, who led Nexon’s P3 project, a first-person action game.
During the COVID-19 pandemic, Choi stored thousands of P3 files on a private server.
Initially permitted for remote work, Nexon later requested the server and files back.
In July 2021, Nexon changed the P3 project’s direction, leading Choi and others to leave and form Ironmace, aiming to create a similar game, which became Dark and Darker.
Recent News: 2nd Project Leak from Nexon! Project KV vs Blue Archive Controversy, Police Raid on Dynamis One.
Nexon alleged that Choi took P3 files without permission and used them for Dark and Darker.
This led to legal complaints, office raids, and lawsuits in South Korea and the US.
Nexon even temporarily removed Dark and Darker from Steam to stop Ironmace from using what they considered stolen assets.
Reddit User Milskidasith commented, “So basically the courts concluded that Ironmace did steal/ utilize a bunch of Nexon work to create Dark and Darker quickly, but that act didn’t meet the bar for copyright infringement, while they were still hit with a sizable corporate espionage penalty.”
This highlights the complexities of the case, where trade secrets played a more significant role than copyright infringement.
The Court Ruling: Copyright Infringement vs. Trade Secrets
The Seoul Central District Court ruled that Ironmace did not infringe on Nexon’s copyright for its P3 project.
However, the court found Ironmace guilty of violating Nexon’s trade secrets. A former Nexon employee, who led the P3 project, had stolen source codes and data, which were then used to develop Dark and Darker.
This misuse led the court to order Ironmace to pay 8.5 billion won ($5.5 million USD) in damages to Nexon.
The ruling underscores the importance of protecting trade secrets.
Companies must secure sensitive information through non-disclosure agreements and safe storage practices.
Misusing trade secrets can lead to severe legal consequences, as seen in this case, which was reported in detail by Biz Chosun.

Impact on Dark and Darker and the Gaming Industry
The court ruling significantly impacts Ironmace and Dark and Darker.
The 8.5 billion won ($5.5 million USD) damages could strain Ironmace’s resources, potentially affecting game development and marketing efforts.
Reddit User KraftPunkFan420 questioned, “Is Dark and Darker going to survive this? I’ll admit I know nothing about the ins and outs of the industry, but 5 million USD still seems like a ton for an indie studio with one middle-sized game,”
While the amount is substantial, Ironmace could manage it by securing loans and leveraging their existing product.
The ruling sets a precedent for trade secret claims over copyright issues. It may prompt game developers to handle trade secrets more carefully, enforce stricter non-disclosure agreements, and develop better risk management protocols.
This case could redefine how companies approach intellectual property in the gaming industry.
Legal and Ethical Considerations
The case raises important legal and ethical questions. Using an employee’s general skills is permissible, but protecting specific, confidential information is crucial.
Misusing such information can be considered trade secret theft, as seen in this case.
This highlights the broader ethical concerns around data privacy and security in gaming. The case emphasizes the need for transparency in data collection and usage.
Developers must clearly communicate how they secure player data and ensure privacy to build trust.
Anti-cheat tools, while necessary for fair play, must balance effectiveness with privacy protections to avoid alienating players.
In Conclusion
The case between Nexon and Ironmace highlights the critical importance of intellectual property protection in the gaming industry.
While Dark and Darker was cleared of copyright infringement, the trade secret violations have significant financial and reputational implications for Ironmace.
This ruling serves as a cautionary tale for game developers about the boundaries of using internal knowledge and assets, and the need for robust legal and ethical frameworks in their practices.